The story is a little hard to follow. Or the voice fades in and out. The transitions are sometimes not clear. Needs Work There is no clear division of the different sections of the story.
The speaker sounds as if he or she cares too little or too much about the topic. The author does not seem to have used much imagination.
Fair Dialogue is not realistic or uninteresting. Characterization The main characters are named and clearly described using variety of direct and indirect techniques. Work functions well as a whole.
Retrieved August 19, from http: Structure Excellent There are three clear segments of the story, following the prompt. Title is present, but may not be unique.
All sentences are well-constructed with varied and interesting structure patterns. Most readers could describe the characters accurately. Surprises the reader with unusual associations, breaks conventions, thwarts expectations. Quality of Dialogue Excellent Dialogue is realistic and interesting, following the lessons from class.
Most readers would have some idea of what the characters are like.
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling. Research for short story somewhat effective with two sources that are documented. Voice is confident and appropriate. There is an interesting opener, and the character has clearly learned a lesson by the end. University Community Links n.
Excellent use of imagery; similes; vivid, detailed descriptions; figurative language; puns; wordplay; metaphor; irony.
Research for short story is not apparent and without any documented sources. Fair The story is somewhat developed or rambling and verbose. Some startling images, a few stunning associative leaps with a weak conclusion or lesser, more ordinary images and comparisons.
Name, date, and class are present. Development Excellent The story is extremely developed and thorough without being verbose. Students will use appropriate voice and tone in writing. The conflict is explored, and there is some development of the characters.
The main characters are named and described using some direct and indirect techniques.Creative Writing Example Rubric killarney10mile.com > Vice Provost for Strategic Planning & Educational Effectiveness > Office of Assessment > Assessment Resources > Rubrics > Example Rubrics > Creative Writing Example Rubric.
Short Story Writing Rubric. Basic 1 Sound. 2 Thorough. 3 Extensive. 4 Score Content Overly simplistic No clear controlling idea and/or theme Story elements may or may not reveal a controlling idea/theme Combines story elements around a controlling idea to reveal a thought-provoking theme Skilfully combines all story elements around a.
Creating a writing rubric helps students improve their writing skills by determining their areas of opportunity. Writing Rubrics Samples of Basic, Expository, and Narrative Rubrics. Share Flipboard Email Skillfully combines story elements around main idea; Focus on topic is profoundly clear.
The story contains a few creative details and/or descriptions that contribute to the reader's enjoyment. The author has used his/her imagination. The story contains a few creative details and/or descriptions, but they distract from the story. The author has tried to use his/her imagination.
Short Story Grading Rubric. Weighted Rubric for Short Story Using Research The story contains a few creative details and/or descriptions that contribute to the reader's enjoyment. The author has used his/her imagination. The story contains a few creative details and/or descriptions, but they distract from the story.
ENG2D RUBRIC: Creative Writing Task: Short Story Unit Categories 50%% (Level 1) 60%% (Level 2) 70%% (Level 3) 80%% (Level 4) Knowledge and Understanding: WRITING /10 The student: Knowledge of content Demonstrates limited knowledge of form Demonstrates some knowledge of form Rubric for Short .Download